UESPWiki:Deletion Review/Bloodmoon:Collecting Swords

A UESPWiki – Sua fonte de The Elder Scrolls desde 1995
This is an archive of past UESPWiki:Deletion Review discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page, except for maintenance such as updating links.

Bloodmoon:Collecting Swords

The game doesn't designate this quest as seperate, and instead part of the quest Bloodmoon:Under Siege (CO_13). Site policy has been to use the boundaries set by the the games. So in this case the content of this article should be on the Under Siege quest page. --Timenn-<talk> 15:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete: As nominator. --Timenn-<talk> 15:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: As Timenn points out, there is no quest with this name and it is clearly part of a different quest. If we start splitting up quests according to the whims of individual editors we will end up with a mass of unclear pages that help nobody. –rpehTCE 16:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: While unfamiliar with Bloodmoon, having reviewed the arguments, I have to agree. If it's one quest in the game and/or construction set, then it should be one quest here on the site. —Robin Hood (TalkE-mailContribs) 18:05, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: I'm also unfamiliar with Bloodmoon, but after reading all the arguments and a bit of comparing between the original page and the "new" one, I can't see why "Collecting Swords" would be relevant at all. --Krusty 18:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Ditto everyone. --GKTalk2me 18:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep: I still feel that this should stay. I am very familar with Bloodmoon and being an expeienced Bloodmoon player, i feel it should stay. However, if i am the minority i shall step aside. Balthore 02:24, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: So Light the Dragonfires should be split because there is an unexpected twist in the quest...? No. –Elliot talk 03:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: One quest, one page. Seems simple enough to me! –Eshetalk 03:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: My opinion on the matter has been made on the Talk Page for the article in question, and has been summed up by others here. -Dlarsh(Talk,Contribs) 23:51, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Of course it should be deleted. There is no quest called "Collecting Swords". That should be all that matters. --Calliope 13:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Removing vote of suspected sockpuppetEshetalk 23:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: The reasons are already stated by others, but this page should definitely be deleted. Talk Wolok gro-Barok Contributions 15:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)