UESPWiki:Deletion Review/Morrowind:Master Trainers

This is an archive of past UESPWiki:Deletion Review discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page, except for maintenance such as updating links.

Morrowind:Master Trainers

Morrowind:Trainers now makes this page redundant, as the Master trainers all are easily found on the tops of the sections.

Does anyone else have any opinions about this deletion? To review:

• This page was originally proposed for deletion by User:TheRealLurlock on Dec. 4
• The deletion tag was then deleted by Dracos1485 on Dec. 16. No edit summary was provided, but a request for feedback from him led to this comment on Morrowind Talk:Master Trainers on Dec. 16:

A seperate page for master trainers makes it much easier to find the Trainer neceassary to level up a character, much quicker and easier to refer to than the main skill page.

• The page was put up for deletion review by Lurlock on Dec. 19

--Nephele 13:07, 12 January 2007 (EST)

• Redirect - From a purely administrative perspective, this page does have a substantial page history (19 revisions by 12 different editors going back March 10, 2005). So I don't think deletion is actually appropriate; if the page is deemed unnecessary it should instead be changed to a redirect. But I'll defer to Morrowind editors on the larger question of whether the page should be kept as is. --Nephele 13:07, 12 January 2007 (EST)
• Keep - I agree with Nephele that it is easy to find the master trainers from this separate table. --FMan | Talk | http://www.fooman.fi/ 15:21, 17 January 2007 (EST)
• Redirect - I think it's as easy to find in one or the other page. --DrPhoton 03:23, 18 January 2007 (EST)
• Keep - It's very easy to find what you're looking for on the separate table with only the master trainers, but with the other table it is more of a pain to go to each skill separately, even if the master trainer is at the top. --Hellrunner 18:50, 28 January 2007 (EST)

With at least two votes (three if you include Dracos1485) to keep this page, I'll go ahead and say that this page should be kept. If there are readers who find this format most convenient, then it's not really redundant. --Nephele 19:16, 31 January 2007 (EST)